BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shaun Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:38:33 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines)
I'm getting a home built tuner and a,,, and I am skeptical here, braille 
vswr meter. off a friend if he ever pulls his finger out. so I'll have 
at least some way of knowing what the antenna's doing.


On 23/02/2008 12:17 PM, the old scribe known as T Behler was able to 
impart this pearl of wisdom:
>     Shaun:
> 
> I'd say 30 feet or so should do quite well for you.
> 
> The challenge is getting supports for that height, if you don't have trees 
> to work with, but there are lots of low-profile support poles and masts that 
> you could buy for relatively little money.
> 
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: buddipole.
> 
> 
>> ok let's assume for a moment I'm in a restricted covenence(spelling
>> required,) area. what would be the best hight wise to get a reasonable
>> signal out on say, 80 or 40 meters?
>>
>>
>> On 23/02/2008 11:47 AM, the old scribe known as T Behler was able to
>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>     Shaun:
>>>
>>> A roll of reasonable-quality copper wire can do wonders, especially if 
>>> you
>>> can get it up high enough, so that might be your best bet in the long 
>>> run.
>>>
>>> Remember, you'll need something to tune the antenna with, but there are 
>>> lots
>>> of options out there.
>>>
>>> Good luck, and 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:45 PM
>>> Subject: Re: buddipole.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm thinking of a long wire configuration. the next thing is getting the
>>>> accursed thing up high enough to be of any use. if I want to be real
>>>> stealthy I could run it along my fense which is about 5 foot off the
>>>> ground but, that could be a problem efficiency wise. I need to find a
>>>> happy medium where I can get the best out of my nice shiney new piece of
>>>> wire and yet be able to pull it down and erect it at a moment's notice.
>>>> I might even try a tak-tenna but I'm a cheap scate. so I'll settle for
>>>> my 8 dollar roll of copper wire.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/02/2008 1:20 PM, the old scribe known as T Behler was able to
>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>>     Shaun:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd suggest either a long wire, if you have the room, or a G5RV.
>>>>>
>>>>> That way, you can get multiple bands with one antenna, especially if 
>>>>> you
>>>>> have something to tune it with.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:44 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: buddipole.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> in that case, what would you reccomend for an antenna? do bare in mind
>>>>>> I'm on a budget. I might just have to string up a 40 m length of wire
>>>>>> and fiddle about with a tuner to match it. I can make a dipole easily
>>>>>> enough but I need stealth and blind friendly. and I'm well aware that
>>>>>> the two aren't synonymous with one another..
>>>>>> thanks. shaun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> __________ NOD32 2894 (20080221) Information __________
>>>>>
>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2897 (20080222) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 2897 (20080222) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2