wa3owl is not a legal amateur radio call sign?
hmmm, which country you in?
My question is, is it wa3owl, or is it wa3oal, obviously the C was meant as
a 3 in the message, but you really should have corrected the sintax error if
you wanted this message to be clear and concise anthony.
Now we don't know weather we should be listening for wa3owl, or wa3oal, or
if we should indeed be switching the c for a 3, or what the deal is.
Sure, we can guess, and probably be right, but that sort of defeats the
whole purpose of this message.

73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: WA3OWL


> That's not even a legal amateur radio call sign, because it does not
contain
> a district number.
> Harvey
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:30 PM
> Subject: WA3OWL
>
>
> > The above subject, WACOAL, was banned from the BEARS network over 2
years
> > ago by myself for various reasons I will not go into at this time.  A
> > registered
> > letter was sent to him, copied to the FCC Langhorne office, advising him
> > to
> > stay off the BEARS repeaters. For over 2 years he has been quiet
(possibly
> > due to incarceration), but now he is back announcing his call and
> > attempting
> > to engage someone in conversation.
> >
> > Do Not respond to WACOAL if you hear him announce his call, and if you
> > would,  document the date and time (as well as what repeater your heard
> > him
> > on) I
> > will take follow up action with the local FCC office. Please e-mail the
> > information.
> >
> > Thanks for your help in this matter.
> >
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 8/6/2007
4:53 PM
>
>