BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Re_SB-220
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:03:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Great theory; not always practical.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jaco Lubbe (Bergleeu)" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Re_SB-220


> Yes bigger and better antennas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
> Sent: 15 August 2009 12:39 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Re_SB-220
>
> In ham radio, size does matter.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2