BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 3 May 2015 09:58:24 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Hi Steve!

Thanks for the link. I've heard it. It does seem kind of pointless to just
listen to talk about it, and never actually get a chance to hear the feature
in action that supposedly justified the claim. 

Granted Doug has a nice presentation style, but anyone with that much talent
should have known better than post it that way. 

Sparc's claim is lame, but even so, hearing that speech would have had
greater value to most listeners than the excitement he gets from the
relative comparisons.


Except for the frequency, it doesn't sound like it would tell us anything
that we don't already know. I will be curious to hear what their response to
him might be.

73,
Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2015 4:16 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Dropbox Link to Spark Talking Radio File

Blankhttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/93478912/Spark%20Talking%20hd%20rad
io.mp3

Make sure you get the whole link on one line, it ends with .mp3.



Steve, K8SP

ATOM RSS1 RSS2