BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:06:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi Butch;

If the F6 is ever discontinued, I'm sure Kenwood's conventions will remain 
the same.

There radios are very intuitive even without speech.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Kenwood Ts-480S Was: deciding on an HT


> Well, the 2000 also has an internal tunher.  As far as which radio,
> depends on a couple things, the price, and second, do you want 2 and 440
> all mode and dual receive for these bands and so forth.  I have both rigs
> and like them both.  I think the 480 is one of the most accessible rigs
> you can buy and I sure do like mine.  You wouldn't go wrong on either one.
>
> As far as the f6, I also have one of those, and as some one else said, if
> they discontinue it, I'll go grab another for a spare.  I like the radio
> that much.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2