Well, it depends what you want to use it for.

Just making the same decisions.

I have compared the receiver of the ic-910 with the ts2000 and there is 
no comparison.

Using weak beacons just at the noise level and the icom wins every time.

Also, the strong signal handelling of the icom is very good.

If you are interested in vhf/uhf weak signal ssb and cw then the icom wins.

Only close alternative is the kenwood ts-790.



John Miller wrote:
> Icom 910 is 2 meters and 440 only with a 1296 option, it has no HF and 
> probably costs about as much as the Kenwood by the time it's said and done, 
> Kenwood having 160 all the way up, all but 900 MHz and 220.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Stevenson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 12:57 PM
> Subject: icom vs kenwood
> 
> 
>> Hi.
>>
>> I want to choose between the icom 910 and the kenwood 2,000x
>>
>> 160m through 1296MHz,.
>>
>> How are the speech accessible features different?
>>
>> Also I want to compare icom vs kenwood 6m through 450MHz or is it 1296 MHz 
>> talkeys.
>>
>> Thanks much again as always.
>>
>> 73
>> wb6 yoy
>>
>> (650) 604-5720
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jim Stevenson Ph.D
>> experimental psychologist, conducting sonification research,
>> & certified master Ericksonian clinical hypnotherapist.
>> [log in to unmask]
>> (650) 604-5720 w
>> or leave message any time.
>>
>> ham call
>> wb6yoy 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4304 (20090804) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4305 (20090804) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com