BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:44:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Well, for those of you who don't know, or who missed it, we had a record 27 
check-ins for this afternoon's cross-country blind ops net.  The net ran for 
an hour and 27 minutes.

I hope folks had as much fun as I did, just hearing the variety of people 
and locations that were represented.

On the net this afternoon, Bob (K8LR) suggested that we try an echo-link net 
sometime, for those who can't seem to get into our HF net festivities.

I got to thinking about the echo-link possibility, and would like to propose 
that we keep doing the SSB net as usual, now that we are finding 20 meters 
to work much better, but maybe have the echo-link net at some other day and 
time?  I'm willing to continue holding down the fort on the SSB net, but am 
thinking that it would be good if someone else with a particular interest in 
Echo-link could spearhead the echo-link  operation.

This way, we'll have two nets, and two ways to talk with each other.

I'd be curious to know what everyone else thinks.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2