BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Martin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:24:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
This discussion grew out of a comment I posted here last week.  It had to do
with initial difficulty I experienced renewing my amateur license using
ZoomText Xtra.  In that note I noted that I have lost all but 1% vision in
remaining eye and that I will likely be searching for a total screen reader.
To that extent comments have been helpful though I am not familiar with some
of the issues.

While this site Title contains the term "HAM:, I don't get the impression
that its purpose is exclusive.  Writing to me directly would keep this
traffic off of the general postings but would not allow for interactive
dialogue.

When I see a topic in which I have no interest, I hit the delete key.

73
Bob Martin
KC3FI

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes


> Excuse me, but what does all this have to do with amateur radio?
>
>
>
> I didn't say anything before when the subject line was really irrelevant
and I also thought the whole thing had died.
>
> Don W6SMB
>
>  Howard Kaufman wrote:
>
> Very well thought out post.  I agree with your concerns.  I have found it
> easy to look for underlined text in the find dialog, or with the find from
> word.  If jfw has a better way, I'd like to learn it.
> I teach beginning students both window-eyes and jfw, so whenever I am in
> error I will listen to you all and try to fix it.  Thank g-d their are two
> competitors, or we'd all be much worse off.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2