Hi all!
Here's something amusing. I'm just a little surprised Apple didn't go after
this guy for the business name he's chosen.
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Roszmann [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, 12 February 2016 1:07 a.m.
To: Don Roszmann
Subject: Apple courts controversy with Error 53; Tactic that disables
iPhones
The Toronto Star
(2016-02-11)
News
Apple courts controversy with Error 53; Tactic that disables iPhones
repaired by anyone but Apple sparks talk of class-action suits
Whose iPhone is it anyway?
That's one of the questions surrounding Apple's smartphones after a growing
number of people have reported their devices being made unusable -
accompanied by an "Error 53" message - after having them fixed by a
third-party repair shop.
Thousands of consumers have reportedly been affected by this error message,
which occurs when software is upgraded on phones, according to the Guardian.
The error message has sparked talk of lawsuits against the computer giant.
Apple said in a statement this error stems from a feature of iOS9, related
to its Touch ID fingerprint scanner in the home button of the iPhone 6 and
iPhone 6S models. "This security measure is necessary to protect your device
and prevent a fraudulent Touch ID sensor from being used. If a customer
encounters Error 53, we encourage them to contact Apple Support."
However, consumer advocates and legal experts have a different view.
"It's outrageous ... they're really extending their rights and reach, and
it's not clear to me the justification for doing so," said David Fewer,
director of the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic at the
University of Ottawa.
"Because it certainly looks like they are interfering with my property."
Critics compare it to car repairs. Most people use a third-party mechanic to
fix to their vehicles.
What if the automaker could kill any car that got parts from a local
mechanic?
Fewer said that Apple is employing a remarkably aggressive tactic for such
an expensive device - and one that consumers are not aware of when buying
the smartphone.
"It seems to me the entire third-party device servicing industry is the
likeliest target," Fewer said.
Phil Kundu is the owner and operator of Irepair.ca, a phone repair store
with eight locations.
Until last week, the company was repairing home buttons on the iPhone 6 and
6S models, but has now stopped.
Kundu says that although the vast majority of iPhone repairs are cracked
screens, in the case of extreme damage then the home button might also need
to be fixed.
"By doing this, they're ensuring that customers have to go back to the Apple
store for any repairs or service-related issues for their phones," Kundu
said.
He says customers use third-party repair stores because they are often
faster and cheaper than the Apple Store, which requires that you make an
appointment.
Responding to the mounting criticism, Apple issued the following statement:
"We take customer security very seriously and Error 53 is the result of
security checks designed to protect our customers. iOS checks that the Touch
ID sensor in your iPhone or iPad correctly matches your device's other
components. If iOS finds a mismatch, the check fails and Touch ID, including
for Apple Pay use, is disabled."
In the U.K. and U.S., legal experts and law firms are seeking potential
complainants for class-action lawsuits.
In Canada, Fewer said there may be two options.
"For the third-party repair companies, one is a complaint to the Competition
Bureau. If it is a competitive issue, it strikes me that the (bureau) is a
place for that," he said.
"But if you're looking at remedies for consumers then class action is the
way to go."
Raju Mudhar Tech Reporter
-
|
