BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:40:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
There transmit audio cannot be compared but, I'll take an ICOM receiver any 
day of the week.

VHF/UHF HT or HF.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: icom vs kenwood


> Maybe over there, as far as I'm concerned, Kenwood's still in a class of
> their own with audio.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: icom vs kenwood
>
>
>> for mine, the Icom have the better TX audio these days.
>> Use to be kenwood had the nice TX audio but, they seem to have dropped
>> off over the years.
>>
>> Shaun,
>>
>> vk2fese,
>>
>>  Everyone hears what you say.
>>  Friends listen to what you say.
>>  Best friends listen  to what you don't say.
>>
>> web sites:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>
>> http://www.fanfiction.net/~blindphoenix
>>
>> skype: brailledude
>>
>> msn: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> On 5/08/2009 2:48 AM, Keith Barrett went skydiving, and on the way down,
>> shouted thus.:
>>> Well, it depends what you want to use it for.
>>>
>>> Just making the same decisions.
>>>
>>> I have compared the receiver of the ic-910 with the ts2000 and there is
>>> no comparison.
>>>
>>> Using weak beacons just at the noise level and the icom wins every time.
>>>
>>> Also, the strong signal handelling of the icom is very good.
>>>
>>> If you are interested in vhf/uhf weak signal ssb and cw then the icom
>>> wins.
>>>
>>> Only close alternative is the kenwood ts-790.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John Miller wrote:
>>>> Icom 910 is 2 meters and 440 only with a 1296 option, it has no HF and
>>>> probably costs about as much as the Kenwood by the time it's said and
>>>> done,
>>>> Kenwood having 160 all the way up, all but 900 MHz and 220.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Jim Stevenson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 12:57 PM
>>>> Subject: icom vs kenwood
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to choose between the icom 910 and the kenwood 2,000x
>>>>>
>>>>> 160m through 1296MHz,.
>>>>>
>>>>> How are the speech accessible features different?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also I want to compare icom vs kenwood 6m through 450MHz or is it 1296
>>>>> MHz
>>>>> talkeys.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks much again as always.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> wb6 yoy
>>>>>
>>>>> (650) 604-5720
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Stevenson Ph.D
>>>>> experimental psychologist, conducting sonification research,
>>>>> & certified master Ericksonian clinical hypnotherapist.
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>> (650) 604-5720 w
>>>>> or leave message any time.
>>>>>
>>>>> ham call
>>>>> wb6yoy
>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4304 (20090804) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>> signature database 4305 (20090804) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2