Hi Ron and all,
I have heard of some other lists that have  similer restrictions like this.
I ran in to same thing when i first joind the list.
Thanks 73 Matt ka0pqw
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Canazzi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:16 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]


> Hi Blind Hams List,
>
> There has been a lot of criticism of the way in which the Blind Hams
> list has been handling 8 bit or 7 bit characters that result in all the
> equal signs and other extraneous symbols.  Here's one I didn't realize
> was also a bit of a problem.
>
> I wanted to send the entire copy (511 lines) of the ruling that Gary,
> KB2YAA requested and thought that it would be a courtesy to send it to
> the whole list.  Instead I get a rejection notice from the server
> sayhing that it is too long.
>
> Keep in mind, there is no attachment or other superfluous graphics of
> stuff that would make this message large in actual size, but the length
> of the message in lines is apparently an issue.
>
> This is the only list where I have ever seen this.  I really wish it
> could be changed to conform to modern standards.  I will have to send
> the message separately to Gary and thus deprive anyone else who is
> interested.
>
> See below.
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 02:02:09 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: Ron Canazzi <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Your message  cannot be distributed to  the BLIND-HAMS list because  it 
> exceeds
> the maximum message size of 250 lines. The size of your message was 511 
> lines.
>
> This limit has been set by the list owner and does not necessarily apply 
> to the
> other lists  hosted at  LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG. If you  have any  questions, 
> please
> contact the list owner at [log in to unmask]