BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:29:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
    Gerry:

I noticed the same phenomenon that I mentioned last night in the Denver FM 
market when I was out there.

Very interesting, to say the least.

73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: HD radio


Hey Tom,

HD is quite popular here.  At least there are a lot of stations.  I don't
have an HD radio, but I can find a lot of HD stations using my Iphone.  I
don't know what they will use as a catch, but my thoughts are that
Commercial radio will get so bad that they will be able to charge for HD
memberships.  I don't know why I never paid much attention to it. Gerry
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:36 PM
Subject: HD radio


> Hi, all.
>
> I am not sure if this will be considered by some to be "off topic", but
> last
> evening, I heard something on an FM broadcast station that has confirmed
> my
> long-standing suspicions about where commercial FM radio is going today.
>
> I simply thought it might be of interest to others.
>
> By way of introduction, I have noticed that the quality of many normal
> non-HD FM stations seems to have deteriorated over the past few years,
> especially in larger metropolitan areas.  By declining quality, I mean
> more
> commercials, less music, and what seems to be a much less diverse
> play-list.
>
> My theory had always been that normal non-HD FM stations were simply being
> operated for those who hadn't yet made the switch to HD radio, as kind of
> a
> necessary evil.  It just seemed to me that more resources and efforts were
> being put into HD stations, so as to come up with a better-quality and
> more
> appealing product.
>
> As many of you may know, I am currently traveling throughout the east
> coast,
> and am now spending some time with my wife's mother in the Trenton, New
> Jersey area.
>
> Last night, I was listening to W O G L--98.1 FM in Philadelphia.  In the
> past, that station had been an excellent oldies station, with what I think
> had been very good ratings.
>
> Now, the station has more of a "classic hits" format, with lots of talk,
> commercials, and other stuff between the music.
>
> Anyway, shortly before the top of an hour, the station ID was played,
> followed by a message that said something like this:  "If you want more
> music, more oldies from the 60's and 70's, and more home-town DJ's, tune
> to
> W O G L HD1".
>
> To me, this indicated, at least in this case, that the HD option was
> clearly
> being promoted over the normal non-HD programming.
>
> Am I onto something here, or totally "off base"?
>
> And, please:  to those in the broadcast business (like Lou )WA3MIX), I
> mean
> no offense whatsoever by these observations.
>
> HD radio has not yet arrived in the part of semi-rural west-central lower
> Michigan where I currently live, but if I lived in a bigger metro area, I
> have the feeling that HD radios would quickly be added to my wish list.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2