BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:13:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Don't knock the dog--my dog is more disciplined than most of the guys that 
are on 75 meters at night!  And they passed exams, too.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 12:15 PM 2/24/2008 +1100, you wrote:
>hey it could be worse, exams could have been ditched altogether. then
>every man and his dog and pet weirdo would be on the ham bands. There's
>enough piracy goes on there now without making it easier for them.
>
>
>On 24/02/2008 7:24 AM, the old scribe known as Howard Kaufman was able
>to impart this pearl of wisdom:
> > It's the cold half of a dipole.
> > Frequency in mhz, divided by 468, divided by 2.  Isn't this on the modern
> > exams?
> > Myy g-d!  eliminating the code, now people don't have to know how to 
> figure
> > out antenna length?
> > Why don't we just make the exams in to questions like "what's the e-mail
> > address of your nearest Ham radio store?
> > 2.  Name three companies that make commercial antennas.
> >
> >
> > __________ NOD32 2898 (20080223) Information __________
> >
> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.0/1296 - Release Date: 2/24/2008 
>12:19 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2