BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:33:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
wow!  yours is higher then mine, mine is actually under 2 in most of it's
covered bands, only 2 to 1 in a couple places, until it gets wet then it
changes on 40 and 20 but they all do that.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: talking SWR meter from Remy Simard


> Hi Colin.
>
> Low SWR is a relative term.  The SWR runs anywhere between 2 to 1 and 3 to
> 1 depending upon where and what bands I am loading it on.
> --Lou K2LKK
>
>
> At 07:46 PM 2/19/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>>i guess that g5rv isn't quite the antenna all the discriptions rave on and
>>on and on about then if it exhibits an swr of 9 on any of the bands it
>>supposedly works on?
>>Is there some different circumstance in your qth that makes the swr that
>>high on a g5rv?
>>All the discriptions of that particular antenna claim it has a low swr
>>across all the bands it is designed for.
>>Regards
>>Colin
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2