Well, it would really be cruel if the people who own my old house got a
pink slip as well.  Boy, that would throw them off to get something from
Uncle Sam, and they'd probably wonder about us, and what werare up to, and
may think again about the house, but I don't think a pink slip will happen
any time soon.

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Mike Freeman wrote:

> No, I haven't notified the Friendly Candy Company.  My parents don't
> live too far away -- a couple of miles -- so if I get a pink slip, I'll
> hear about it! (grin)  I really should change my address but just
> haven't gotten around to it.
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Michael Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [usve] ULS troubles (fwd)
>
>
> > Well, it is optional to include your E-mail.  Have you notified them
> of
> > your address change now if you have moved out of your parents house?
> I
> > know that it took em a hell of a long time for the FCC and qrz.com to
> > reflect that I had made the technician ticket.
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Mike Freeman wrote:
> >
> > > My license still shows my parents' address (I lived there a while
> after
> > > my divorce) and, so far as I am aware, I have never received
> anything
> > > via SnailMail notifying me of automatic ULS registration.  I don't
> > > believe FCC even *has* my E-mail address (though I have no
> objections to
> > > their knowing).
> > >
> > > Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:07 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [usve] ULS troubles (fwd)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Well, I was never notified by mail either snail or E-mail, and
> when I
> > > > tried to regitteer to change things in my license it wouldn't let
> me
> > > > establish the pass word.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Walt Smith wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I don't think so, but there was something either here or in one
> of
> > > the
> > > > > mailings of the ARRL and Newsline bulletins recently that talked
> > > about a
> > > > > _new_ system that's supposed to replace ULS in the
> not-too-distant
> > > future
> > > > > and they indicated that all licensees were being placed into ULS
> in
> > > > > preparation for migration to the new system.  I thought about
> this
> > > after you
> > > > > said that you'd never registered for ULS.  I got the impression
> that
> > > we were
> > > > > _supposed_ to have been notified if such an "automatic" ULS
> > > registration had
> > > > > been created for us, though.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, I did some checking and apparently, while Netscape is
> vastly
> > > > > preferred, it's now possible to do at least some work in ULS
> using
> > > Internet
> > > > > Explorer.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >  Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> > > > >  [log in to unmask]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>