sorry john no, i was refering to andrews comment that his g5rv exhibits a
high swr.
i end up deleted  the original because i am afraid that the line count will
be exceeded and the message will get bounced, sorry for the confusion.
Regards
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: talking SWR meter from Remy Simard


> If you're referring to the comment about the matching tuner for the 706,
It
> does have a pretty good SWR on all bands it's meant for, mine has had an
> analyzer put on it but the Icom tuner that is made to match the 706 isn't
> that good, I know 3 people that have had them and all 3 say it's not near
> worth the money where as my LDG, for almost half the price, for me works
> perfect for what I've done so far and a few people told me to stay away
from
> the matching tuner for the 706. If you could put a little of the message
at
> least you're replying to in your message it would help, not everything
just
> the message you're replying to, as kind of a memory refresher, also if
> there's a few threads going on about different things it helps there too.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: talking SWR meter from Remy Simard
>
>
> >i guess that g5rv isn't quite the antenna all the discriptions rave on
and
> > on and on about then if it exhibits an swr of 9 on any of the bands it
> > supposedly works on?
> > Is there some different circumstance in your qth that makes the swr that
> > high on a g5rv?
> > All the discriptions of that particular antenna claim it has a low swr
> > across all the bands it is designed for.
> > Regards
> > Colin
> >
>