BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:07:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
there are no noticeable differences between home and pro versions of either
JAWS or windows xp.
The xp pro has some more administrative options that are more accessible to
the user then the home eddition...but ive been using home and pro on 2
separate machines here and notice almost no difference between them as far
as just general everyday use goes.
I think pro is a little bit more responsive...a bit faster that is, doesn't
clog up so offten as home does, i am refering to the OS that is.
Im sure those who customize jaws or customize windows might have something
different to say but for me and most windows users there isn't any
difference at all...well maybe to the visual user yes but not to the
visually impaired user.
We might be getting a little off topic though guys? ya think?
lol
regards
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: JAWS 6.0 arrived and what a surprise


> What is the differents between the home and pro versions?  I just realized
> that if I get a j there at this medical center they'll want me using one
> of their machines, and my voc rehab counselor will have to get me 6.0 for
> Pro, but for now I am going to use my laptop which has the home version.
> See my last post here but 6.0 for home seems to have helped out with
> regard to clearing out some of the issues I had with pages which had those
> macromedia moovie thigns.  Not sure if Tom will need the home or pro
> version, but I think that at our school they just have home, but  that
> could have changed.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Harvey Heagy wrote:
>
> > The thing is that if a person has the pro version of XP they must also
have
> > the pro version of JFW, and that is more expensive than a standard
version
> > upgrade.
> > Harvey Heagy (N.5.H.A.U.)
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2