Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:02:54 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My manual for my 480 says it draws a max of 21 amps on transmit which means
for the 200 watt version, you would need at least a 42 amp power source.
Take care and very 73.
Kevin :)
Amateur Radio: K7RX
Navy Marine Corps MARS: NNN0SHS
-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 07:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
a 35 to 40 amp power supply should be able to run a 200 watt radio plus
more. If the radio peaks at 250 or so a 35 amp power supply should be quite
sufficient.
I think you said the high power version was a 200 watt version? that would
mean it might peak at 225 or so. No need for a expensive 50 amp power
supply for that unless one plans to run all gear off one power supply.
Regards
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
> I don't think 40 amps would run the other one, I think I was told it's
just
> over that so you'd need 50 amps, I know someone that has one I'll ask
> him but I think he needed 50 amps
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
>
>
> >I think it is 50 watts ssb or Fm on 6 meters, but honestly forgot.
> >Their are 2 models of the 480, One with twice the output on every
> >band, but no internal tuner. I chose the other one. Cheaper and I
> >didn't have to
buy
> > two power suplies, or a huge 40 amp single one. If I did mobile
> > work,
I'd
> > have thought more about the 200 watt model.
> >
>
|
|
|