BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Michael Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:51:44 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (61 lines)
Well, it is optional to include your E-mail.  Have you notified them of
your address change now if you have moved out of your parents house?  I
know that it took em a hell of a long time for the FCC and qrz.com to
reflect that I had made the technician ticket.

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Mike Freeman wrote:

> My license still shows my parents' address (I lived there a while after
> my divorce) and, so far as I am aware, I have never received anything
> via SnailMail notifying me of automatic ULS registration.  I don't
> believe FCC even *has* my E-mail address (though I have no objections to
> their knowing).
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: K 7 U I J
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [usve] ULS troubles (fwd)
>
>
> > Well, I was never notified by mail either snail or E-mail, and when I
> > tried to regitteer to change things in my license it wouldn't let me
> > establish the pass word.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Walt Smith wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think so, but there was something either here or in one of
> the
> > > mailings of the ARRL and Newsline bulletins recently that talked
> about a
> > > _new_ system that's supposed to replace ULS in the not-too-distant
> future
> > > and they indicated that all licensees were being placed into ULS in
> > > preparation for migration to the new system.  I thought about this
> after you
> > > said that you'd never registered for ULS.  I got the impression that
> we were
> > > _supposed_ to have been notified if such an "automatic" ULS
> registration had
> > > been created for us, though.
> > >
> > > Also, I did some checking and apparently, while Netscape is vastly
> > > preferred, it's now possible to do at least some work in ULS using
> Internet
> > > Explorer.
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> > >  [log in to unmask]
> > >
> >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2