BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:15:38 -0230
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi all:

I know that Kenwood does the best with regards to accessibility but I think 
that Yaesu and Elecraft has the market share when it comes to big DXers and 
DXpeditions.
So I doubt that the component side is very poor, considering Collins based 
filters and designs are employed. I'd hate to have to plunk down 5K plus on 
an FTDX-5000 only to have it emplode in a year or 2.
I think I can make a pretty good point from the Yaesu and kenwood argument 
as I've had an FT-450AT, now own an FT-102, owned a TS-940SAT and still 
have my TS-570DG. I'm only upset with Yaesu due to its non caring attitude 
to the blind and visually impaired ham and their attitude that if you want 
1 of our products with speech, buy the 450 else get your XYL to set it up 
and forget it. LOL
As for receive and audio, Yaesu has it right but I digress, there are Ford, 
Dodge and GM fans and on a race Sunday, watch all 3 followers get into a 
fist fight. LOL

73:
Mike DE VO1AX

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2