BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:12:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Unfortunately, around here there are a bunch of different tones used 
otherwise I'd have kept mine with a tone board added.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colleen Roth" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Radio Shack 404 hand held


> Hi Kevin,
> You could have just put in a PL Board for 103.5 which would have been one 
> that is used a lot.
> I would never part with my Ic2at.
> Someday I would like to get an IC4AT.
> Colleen, N8TNV;
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kevin Minor <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: 2010/01/10 12:16:53
> Subject: Re: Radio Shack 404 hand held
>
>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> You talking about the IC-2AT BRINGS BACK GOOD MEMORIES.  I just got my
>> general class license, and for my 17th birthday my Dad said I could 
>> either
>> get a tower for my HF DIPOLE, OR A RADIO TO TALK ON FREQUENCIES ABOVE 30
>> Mhz.  I went to a ham radio store in Cincinnati to look at some models of
>> radio.  In the end I chose the IC-2AT.  I never regretted it.  It's a 
>> real
>> easy radio to use, and if it weren't for needing PL TONES FOR REPEATERS, 
>> IT
>> would still be a great radio.  I kinda wish I still had my old one. 
>> Someone
>> notched the thumbwheels for me so I could quickly find the zero position 
>> on
>> them.
>>
>> 73
>> Kevin Minor, Lexington, KY
>> [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2