BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:52:06 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Verticals are more noisy also

David



-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Bob Martin
Sent: 24 August 2007 01:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 6v vertical antenna

The 6V probably won't out perform the wire antenna in most cases.  Mine is 
ground mounted with 8 radials and the added 160 meter coil.  My fan dipole 
has logged lots more DX including a camel mobile.  Tell you that true story 
some day.  Good luck.

Bob
KC3FI

EchoLink Node - 55127
Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 3:39 PM
Subject: 6v vertical antenna


> I'll be putting the vertical butternut 6v up tomorrow.  I ordered the =
> coax today so it will be here tomorrow.  I am curious to see if the =
> reception is better with the vertical than it is with the dipole.  =
> Anyway, I'll have both of them to switch back and forth from.
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.2/967 - Release Date: 22/08/2007
18:51
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.2/967 - Release Date: 22/08/2007
18:51
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2