Speaking of cb, if you are interested, I have both the cb ten code and the 
cb slang in text form.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: just an item of interest and an observation


> NO, nothing is wrong, but I was just wondering if any of you take any
> advantage of that band at all?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: just an item of interest and an observation
>
>
>> something wrong with CB frequencies?
>> Just cuz they're not hams doesn't mean they should automatically be
>> blocked
>> from general coverage receivers....
>> Same reason many general coverage receivers have the 45-50MHZ band in
>> them...not because there is much there, other then baby monitors and some
>> older cordless phones but because its just part of the general 
>> coverage...
>>
>> regards
>> Colin
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:35 PM
>> Subject: just an item of interest and an observation
>>
>>
>>> Hi everyone, I have noticed that a lot of the radios I have gotten have
>> the
>>> CB channels as coverage.  I don't listen to them that much, and haven't
>>> operated on CB for years, but I have noticed that with my DX-390 and my
>> F6a,
>>> and my scanners I have CB coverage.  I am just wondering why so many
>> radios
>>> have this?  I happened to tune by someone on the CB band this afternoon
>> and
>>> shall we say he was conducting himself in a way that the ham community
>> would
>>> frown on.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>