BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:04:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Hi Lou;

If you already know what pl tone you already had sent for a specific 
repeater then, what's the difference.

You could put a list of pl tones in Braille and just count the clicks.

Or, maybe I'm missing something.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] thinking of changing rigs


> If Icom would just address the PL tone problem, I'd go over to Icom in a 
> heartbeat.  Asking someone else to help me set them up isn't good enough. 
> I live by myself, so asking a sighted family member to help just isn't an 
> option.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 10:06 AM 3/7/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>>I would like to think most icoms aren't as hard to manage as the 706 and
>>with some practice, and the speech it does have, that's a very manageable
>>radio, at least for me. Maybe when I actually have the money to replace my
>>HF radio I might look at the 746 or 756pro III or what ever's out at that
>>time since I did like those radios when I played with them but the TS-2000
>>is, for now, my number 1 choice by far. It's getting high time for me to
>>replace the 570 though, if for no other reason, just to get something
>>different to sit in front of every day.
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 9:29 AM
>>Subject: Re: thinking of changing rigs
>>
>>
>> > Lou,
>> >
>> > I've always thought Icoms were way ahead of Kenwoods in the
>> > sensitivity and noise department, but their lack of speech feedback
>> > makes them difficult for us to use.  That was less of an issue when
>> > there were more controls on the front panel, but today everything is
>> > buried in menus and it makes operation tough for us.  It's just so
>> > nice to be able to access everything, and that's why I bought my 480.
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/275 - Release Date: 3/6/2006
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2