BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:30:30 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (52 lines)
That is what I heard, but it s supposed to be really advanced.  With some
kinds of simulcast systems I hope it is working better then other units.





On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, John Miller wrote:

> that I don't know, my friend is sighted but he says programming it directly
> is way more trouble than it's worth.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: has anyone had the chance to try out the new PSR5-1 scanner?
>
>
> > Yes, and has anyone found JAWS or Wineyes to work with the software?  I
> > know one of the packages for that was designed by the same individual who
> > designed the software for teh 96 which doesn't work out of the box with
> > JAWS that well, but with a few tricks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, John Miller wrote:
> >
> >> If that's the one a friend of mine has, with 8 steps to program it
> >> manually,
> >> he says program it with the computer. Not sure if that's the one, that
> >> will
> >> do almost any trunked system and all? big $$$?
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:02 PM
> >> Subject: has anyone had the chance to try out the new PSR5-1 scanner?
> >>
> >>
> >> > Hi everyone, has anyone had the chance to check out the new PSR-501
> >> > scanner from Radio Shack, and if so what do you think?  I am thinking
> >> > of
> >> > upgrading to one, and I've read that it is ratically different from
> >> > the
> >> > Pro-96.
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2