BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jan 2010 00:45:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hi Tom;
I think it would be nice if someone could take Echolink checkins  
during this net.
I know I would be more than happy to participate.
73 De Anthony w2ajv


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:44 PM, tom behler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Well, for those of you who don't know, or who missed it, we had a  
> record 27
> check-ins for this afternoon's cross-country blind ops net.  The net  
> ran for
> an hour and 27 minutes.
>
> I hope folks had as much fun as I did, just hearing the variety of  
> people
> and locations that were represented.
>
> On the net this afternoon, Bob (K8LR) suggested that we try an echo- 
> link net
> sometime, for those who can't seem to get into our HF net festivities.
>
> I got to thinking about the echo-link possibility, and would like to  
> propose
> that we keep doing the SSB net as usual, now that we are finding 20  
> meters
> to work much better, but maybe have the echo-link net at some other  
> day and
> time?  I'm willing to continue holding down the fort on the SSB net,  
> but am
> thinking that it would be good if someone else with a particular  
> interest in
> Echo-link could spearhead the echo-link  operation.
>
> This way, we'll have two nets, and two ways to talk with each other.
>
> I'd be curious to know what everyone else thinks.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2