last I knew there was none of that around here, that's probably a good 
thing, AM is a waste of time around here anyway. No one listens and I can't 
blame them. Digital or otherwise.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Digital AM Receivers


>    Phil and all:
>
> This really makes you question the wisdom of the FCC, doesn't it?
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:06 PM
> Subject: Digital AM Receivers
>
>
>> Anybody have a recommendation for a digital AM receiver?  Boy, lots, over
> a
>> dozen, digital signals now here in Denver, if not more, and growing all
> the
>> time and even with the little stations.  In fact, I cannot even hear a
>> station that used to be 10 over S9 in Cheyenne because two local stations
>> close together are running their digital signals in-between and the
> digital
>> signals are so loud, they cover up the station 100 miles away that used 
>> to
>> be considered a local station in Denver's market.
>>
>> Phil.
>> K0NX
>>
>>
>> Has He Ever Crossed Your Mind?
>> www.SafePlaceFellowship.com
>>
>
>