Better in the Boston area? my god, you mean it actually gets worse? That's 
pathetic. I'm in the Boston area, so to speak as you probably know.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [NYDXA-List] FCC Approves IBOC Go Ahead


> Butch,
>
> I wouldn't even mind paying for it if the content were decent, but I
> certainly don't want to pay for what passes for programming on most
> commercial radio stations.  It's better here in the Boston area than in 
> many
> places around the country, but it's far too formulaic, and mostly just 
> plain
> boring.  I think it all goes back to the fact that as long as it's free, 
> you
> only get what the sponsors are willing to pay for, and that isn't
> necessarily what you or I (or any other listener, for that matter) want.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:14
> Subject: Re: Fw: [NYDXA-List] FCC Approves IBOC Go Ahead
>
>
>> There sure isn't much on a m worth listening to these days.  Who cares if
>> art bell is digital or not?  I'm getting a little tired of the "it is
>> digital, so it has got to be better" idea.  I think the plan is for free
>> radio to go away.  The first thing they have to do to make it a pay
>> service is convert folks to digital.  Radio is going the way of
>> television, no longer commercial supported.
>> 73s
>> Butch Bussen
>> wa0vjr
>>
>>
>>