Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:16:00 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi
Well, I bought the dipole mounting bracket and two hamsticks. When I
had the whip on just the hot side I got better reports than when I had both
whips installed. This is backwards to all logic but I thought if it works,
well I will run with it for a bit. Then my logic kicked in and I
re-installed the counter poise section and went with less signal. So, right
now I am running a vertical dipole made out of two hamsticks.
God bless,
Mark
God loves you!
My ham radio lists.
http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: buddipole.
> how did you get around the issue of needing a counterpoise? because a
> mobile antenna needs one regardless of what any documentation might say.
> the counterpoise is well,, yall know what a counterpoise is so don't
> need to preech to the converted.
> shaun
>
>
> On 22/02/2008 5:05 PM, the old scribe known as Frederick was able to
> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>> Hi
>> Personally I have received decent but not outstanding reports using
>> a
>> single ham stick mobile antenna mounted about six feet off the ground.
>> For
>> some reason I can't explain putting two hamsticks together in the dipole
>> configuration decreased my signal strength reports. I should mention I am
>> using them on 75 meters. So, having them with the lower half of the
>> antenna
>> about two inches off the ground is bound to decrease the efficiency.
>> These are just my thoughts but for about $29 per antenna they are
>> quite
>> a bargain and I have had a blast with them.
>>
>> God bless,
>> Mark
>> God loves you!
>> My ham radio lists.
>> http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: buddipole.
>>
>>
>>> in that case, what would you reccomend for an antenna? do bare in mind
>>> I'm on a budget. I might just have to string up a 40 m length of wire
>>> and fiddle about with a tuner to match it. I can make a dipole easily
>>> enough but I need stealth and blind friendly. and I'm well aware that
>>> the two aren't synonymous with one another..
>>> thanks. shaun.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2894 (20080221) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|
|
|