LISTSERV - BLIND-HAMS Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BLIND-HAMS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.
From:	John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:49:30 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (17 lines)

I'm surprised they lasted this long.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Chao" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: It looks like bye-bye for Radio Shack.


> Interesting.  It's bad enough that their selection isn't the
> greatest.  The link sort of explains all that.--Matt, N1IBB.
>
> At 02:41 PM 2/3/2015 -0500, you wrote:
>>Forwarded message:
>>
>>I was just sent the following link about Radio Shack:
>>http://www.arrl.org/news/radioshack-s-long-slow-downward-slide-nears-the-end

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG