BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shaun Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:57:16 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
hahahaha. gotta get the 120 yet, so might even be able to swing an mc50 
as part of the package. have to do me some careful looking.
it's a pity them old rigs didn't have any speech processing or 
compression feature. what I remember of the older kenwoods, the speech 
processor was second to none. and with the mc50 driving it, it was just 
that much better. I do have a Yaesu YD-148 which I got for nothing and 
it still works. so if all else fails, I'll use that. it has a nice sound 
and a flexable gooseneck, and the head looks like a golf ball. maybe 
that will drive the radio just nicely.


On 1/03/2008 2:40 PM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to 
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> 1 thing I learned, cables and mics, you never get rid of because when you 
> need them again, you can't find them anywhere for a reasonable price if at 
> all. I've been looking for a reasonable Icom SM-8 since I got my current 
> IC-706 3 years ago or so, maybe 4 years ago now, anyway, I can't find them 
> for anywhere near what I paid for my first one and the prices I see them 
> for, when I do see them, I wouldn't pay for it quite honestly. I should have 
> kept the first one.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:35 PM
> Subject: Re: TS-120
> 
> 
>> I'm gonna try get an mc50 to go with the 120 as I like them old mics.
>> even the squeaky key noise. I use to love sitting there on cb bands and
>> keying down ever so slowly just to give people the tom tits with my 100
>> watts of squeaky mc50 key.
>>
>>
>> On 1/03/2008 2:05 PM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>> With the MC-50, all those older radios sounded great. 520, 120, 130, I 
>>> think
>>> 140 was 4 pin, 530, 820, 830,  and any I missed with the 4 pin connector.
>>> The hand mics don't impress me, the the MC-50 does and the commercial mic 
>>> I
>>> have I got with my TS-520 isn't too bad either, or the other similar 
>>> mics.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TS-120
>>>
>>>
>>>> hahahaha. the radios I blew the bum outa were on air at the time. I was
>>>> making some adjustments and I needed an ear a fair way away to inform me
>>>> of any changes in the audio and well you get the idea.
>>>> oh well, while I'm on it, what do people think about the tx audio of the
>>>> old 120s, from what I remember of the things, they had some grunt even
>>>> without any kind of compression or processing. even the 120v had some
>>>> balls.
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2912 (20080229) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 2912 (20080229) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2