AXSLIB-L Archives

Liberation Throough IT Accessibility (an EASI member list)

AXSLIB-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"McCandlish, Karen (ETS: Library)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Library Access -- http://www.rit.edu/~easi
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 11:05:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
It has come up on another list, as a question by someone who had never heard
the term "differently abled" before, as to what the preferred or acceptable
terms are to the differently abled community?  As there was a recent
discussion on the rudeness of the use of the term "disabled", I would like
to know what words describing the visual impaired, physically challenged
(formerly know as handicapped) or learning disabled might be used as a
non-demeaning alternative?

I am aware of these terms being in current use: differently abled,
physically challenged, also spectrum disorder (type of learning disability,
but who would know it), visually impaired, and handicapped.  Just wondering,
and I suppose it is sometimes a personal preference, which are considered
non-offensive?  From what I'm hearing the terms disabled, handicapped and
impaired are offensive and shouldn't be used.  Thus how would a blind or
visually impaired person like the matter to be discussed in a community
forum or accessibility for example, so that all would know what we are
talking about.  To me it appears to be an issue of educating the public.

                                                                -Karen
McCandlish
                                                                Monroe
Community College
                                                                Leroy V Good
Library

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2