BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"Infarct a Laptop Daily\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mary Dierickx <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:40:16 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Infarct a Laptop Daily\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
How about the 1916 zoning resolution - that created more regulation than
preservation.  I agree, there was a lot a scary stuff built in mid-century -
that's certainly one reason I'm a preservationist.  I think that architecture
criticism has not recovered from that period and only loves standout,
no-context buildings. Everything else - like Polshek's 1980's contextual 6s
apartment building on Sixth Avenue in the Village - doesn't really count.
NYC is built up Herbert, live with it.

Mary Dierickx, NYC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2