BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"Callahan's Preservationeers\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:59:10 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Callahan's Preservationeers\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In a message dated 04/21/2000 12:50:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< So, the preferred alternative is to demolish the thing completely, along
 with its Greek Revival neighbors, dump the rubble in a landfill somewhere,
 and replace it with a ten-story new building? >>

No, I don't prefer the demolition - I like seeing the building where it is.
And as my post stated, I don't necessarily disagree with Landmark
designation.  Simply asking the question about how we would "protect" this
building doesn't indicate opposition to that protection - or does it?

Christopher Gray
(Who is still hoping to be listed in the "2000 Greatest Writers of the 19th
Century")

ATOM RSS1 RSS2