Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - RAW-FOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
RAW-FOOD Home RAW-FOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
viktoras comments on nazariah's letter
From:
"Thomas E. Billings" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:10:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Viktoras comments on Nazariah's letter:

http://www.rawfoodsupport.com/read.php?f=12&i=15715&t=15715

In my opinion:
Viktoras' reply contains the usual doublespeak. He seems to be admitting
that raw vegan is not working well for him. He has to take algae and
enzymes (supplements and superfoods -- all highly processed industrial
products) and yet success is still elusive for him.  Despite this,
he still defends raw diets! Some people never learn - especially
when their income comes from promoting a deficient diet. Last time
I saw Viktoras, he looked like "death warmed over" -- heavily
wrinkled and dehydrated.

Viktoras closes with:
"If at least Nazariah advocated all raw - he would make sense."

I would modify it to:
"If at least Viktoras advocated health rather than all raw - he
might make sense once in a while."

Tom Billings

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV