Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:39:06 -1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
arjen:
> Surprise, surprise! Kirt is still making an utter fool
> of himself.
Gosh. Pretty strong stuff.
> Do this little short rantings of you
> really have to impress me?
I wasn't trying to impress you. I was trying to do what you asked for: show
where your thinking falls short. Since you haven't responded to any of the
substance, and chose to rant instead, I can assume you either have no ideas
to respond with, or you have a need to rant. Or something else. Who knows?
> There is absolutely nothing
> worth reacting to in all the things you said.
This isn't very surprizing, that you wouldn't respond to the points I have
made. I'm sure you have your reasons. But here you are "responding" anyway.
I have tried to keep to the issues, and still you react angrily. Puzzling.
> A new
> milepost of brilliancy from your side!
Thank you.
> Your utter
> ignorance shows itself for example by saying that
> antlers are totally unnecessary.
Antlers in humans are necessary? Do you even read my replies?
> Take a class in
> biology Kirt or start using that spongy mass in your
> head.
I am starting to think that you aren't being very nice. But I suppose it is
easier to be dismissive than to think thru the ideas. Again, I'm sure you
have your reasons.
> Also still insisting that our contemporary
> canines are functioning as canines shows ignorance
Gosh. Did I do that? When? Where?
> they function as an extra pair of incisors.
Meaning they don't function to scare human competitors, or to kill prey? I
agree. Did I say otherwise?
> You could
> learn some things if you would read my previous posts
> and get rid of your stupid dogmas.
It hasn't taken long at all for you to show your true colors on this list.
Cheers,
Kirt
|
|
|