Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | BP - "Magma Charta Erupts Weakly" |
Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:43:32 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Arkie Cuz -
What, nothing in the "Yikes" column? wow.
Thanks for the heads-up. I hadn't gotten around to
browsing my copy yet.
- JD
> Johnette,
>
> I saw pictures of a couple "in-fill" examples in the new "preservation" I
> received yesterday. One is just a pic in the "Letters" section, the other
> is in a side bar somewhere.
>
> Arkie Cuz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnette Davies [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 8:56 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: infill
>
>
> Ken -
>
> Currently, the lot is one city block that is empty
> except for some 19th/early 20th-century buildings
> basically lining 2 streets. However, there is one
> substantial hole in one of those streetscapes. If the
> following rough schematic comes up in an orderly
> fashion, it's kind-of like this:
>
> xxxooooooo
> xx o
> xx o
> o o
> o o
> o o
> xx o
> xx o
> xxx xxxxxx
> xxxxxxxxxx
>
> x's are where buildings are located, o's are empty
> lots. (Like many other BP-ers, I don't have ready
> access to a scanner!) The center is used as a surface
> parking lot.
>
> We are looking for examples of projects where the
> buildings have been maintained and/or facades as part of
> a larger block-encompassing development (ie. single
> building).
> > In a message dated 11/8/99 4:25:08 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > > block-wide infill development
> >
> > What is it?
> >
> > ][<en
|
|
|