>axel (on sustainability in food consumption):
>
>all this could be done in a world with much less people. in a world like
>ours, it is not possible to come up with a sustainable way of having all
>people have meat if they want. it is just impossible, considering the size
>of the earth and the number of people

Perhaps you could share some of this mathematical certainty?

>nothing in
>the world is more damaging at all levels than animal husbandry. i am not
>exaggerating at all

Sure, you are. Perhaps you can explain these various levels and how damage
is done...?

Cheers,
Kirt

Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]