INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
STAN MULAIK <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:29:08 -0400
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Io es de accordo con Piet in notar que interlingua ha un lexico grandissime,
que es ancora non jam complete in su registration in dictionarios de
interlingua.  Interlingua es un phenomeno objective, real, e non un
creation artificial. Totevia, si on insenia interlingua in un texto como
"Interlingua Today" per Gopsill, on pote usar un vocabulario restricte,
basic.  Tal considerationes pedagogic non debe denegar le realitate que
interlingua es un lingua ric in expression con un grande vocabulario.

Stan Mulaik

ATOM RSS1 RSS2