Amadeus Schmidt wrote:
> If this book , the sole reference given,
> states that meat was the best source of Vitamin C
> wheras it can be analyzed that muscle-meat contains *zero* vitamin c,
> then i wouldn't count this as a good reference.
Amadeus, your insistence that meat contains zero vitamin C based on
the US gov. database is bordering on dishonest, considering that
it has been pointed out several times here that that value in it
is ASSUMED and not actually measured.

Ilya