Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:59:59 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The price difference is just a marketing difference. A K63 450 is 2-300
hundred now just because they don't make them any more.
I have a K62 550 running this server
Here are Wintune scores for a 500 and 550 ...the 500 on a FIC 503+ and the
550 on a EPOX EP-MVP3C2..which is the most stable superseven board I have
used to date.
K62 550 CPU Integer 1150 MIPS
K62 550 CPU Floating Point 660 MFLOPS
K62 500 CPU Integer 1071.965 MIPS
K62 500 CPU Floating Point 601 MFLOP
AMD will tell you there is a 15 percent difference ...this shows around 8
percent but the margin of error would cover that and Wintune isn't a very
reliable or definitive benchmark.
Mark Rode
The NoSpin Group
>AMD-K6-2-550 vs K6-2-500
>While searching for an upgrade CPU, I discovered the faster
>chip was cheaper than the slower one. I think it is a problem
>with the specs for the FSB, but can't find what I need at AMD.
>Any comments, advise? My MB is a TYAN S1590S-100,
> rev 4+ (Trinity 100 AT) and "is rated" to work with either...
>Would the 95 FSB be less "taxing" on the RAM (PNY-PC-100),
>or any other components? Minor speed differences are not a problem.
>I have NO games and am going for maximum stability.
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
|
|
|