Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Hemlock
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks." -- Mary D
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:41:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Hemlock from what I read does not take preservatives well and it is not a
top rated exterior wood.  (There is usually a reason why a material is not
used for the previous two hundred years!)  I have seen Poplar rot very
quickly, on the order of #2 pine.  Regardless of preparations and coatings a
vertical grain mahogany, redwood, cypress or cedar (most species) will last
much longer than pine or poplar.  Now, which is better, old growth pacific
hemlock or brownstone?
It is good to hear all this wood talk.
Best,
Leland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV