Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: "resulting in a rash of anti-vinyl siding propaganda"
From:
Robert Cagnetta <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Infarct a Laptop Daily"
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:05:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
it has been my observation that there is no real way to maintain a
building's itegrity while insulating.  Most insulation methods prevent
the intended "circulation" of a historic building.  We have all seen the
"peeling" building, where the solution is to remove the siding, because
it was "defective".  My only recommendation for keeping warm in a
historic building is not to buy one on the first place.

Oh, and there is no justification for vinyl over historic material.  none.

Forever opposed to vinyl,

Rob

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV