Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2000 08:07:01 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Comments: |
SoVerNet Verification (on pike.sover.net) [209.198.117.104] from
arc5a294.bf.sover.net [209.198.117.104] 209.198.117.104 Thu, 11
May 2000 17:15:42 -0400 (EDT) |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My neighbors, who can well afford to have whatever they want for
shade/sun control, have awnings on a couple of their west facing
windows. Also, the stores in beautiful downtown Bellows Falls,
Vermont have them, the old fashioned kind that requires someone to go
out with a long pole thingy and turn the crank to let them out and
roll them up. That's all I know about them but they seem to work.
Ruth
At 10:21 AM -0400 5/10/00, Ralph Walter wrote:
>Anybody got anything nominally objective about the relative merits of
>interior window shades (especially modren, glare filtering plastic woven
>ones) versus real, no-shit honest-to-God awnings?
>
>My local Nat'l Register Arboretum, on the board of which I roost, wants to
>reduce glare in our newly-restored 1889 sunporch, which had awnings in the
>Olden Days.
>
>My esteemed colleagues on the Board, who tend to be suburban soccer mom
>gardeners/Martha Stewart types and the retired Telephone Company Bean
>Counters want the cheesy shades, even after I made the supremely foolish
>pitch for awnings on the grounds that they're historic and will reduce
>heating loads/cooling costs.
>
>Help me beat off the forces of Evil. Your assistance will be appreciated.
>
>Ralph
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT
|
|
|