BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"BP - \"where heavy conservationists hang out\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: 100 year old brick building
From:
Barbara Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 09:05:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
"BP - \"where heavy conservationists hang out\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
At 11:54 PM 8/4/1999 EDT, John Mascaro wrote:
>2.Andek.Corp.,a.wonderful.chemical.company.in.Moorestown,NJ([log in to unmask]
om)
>.manufacturers.penetrant.hardeners.that.will.soak.into.the.brick.and.arrest
.fu
>rther.deterioration.

For some reason, I thought this was bad for masonry, or is the problem only
with water repellents and waterproof coatings, not with the penetrant
hardeners?  Are there problems with spalling or water evaporation with the
hardeners, as there can be with the waterproofing?

Barbara Mitchell

(personally, I kind of like the BP keyboard quirks -- I feel left out not
having one, but then I never know what format my text is going out in, so...)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2