RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nieft / Secola <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:21:16 -1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
forest:
>i think that seeds are meant to be eaten by animals and people in nature, the
>question is what level of energy and life extension do these nuts and seeds
>provide and could there be a different diet that would provide more energy and
>life extension. some animals before humans came on the scene became extinct
>possibly due to their limited wisdom of how to optimumly evolve in nature. the
>same thing could happen to our species if we keep thinking a stone age diet is
>the ultimate diet approach for people, even tho it is obvious that it is
>better than the S.A.D. diet.

Huh?!? Are you saying that if we eat the diet we are adapted to we will go
extinct? I am completely awed that you can make that sound plausible in
three sentences. Perhaps because life extension and level of energy (beyond
a certain point) have little to do with evolutionary success.

>maybe seeds are meant to be eaten by animals and humans until they gain the
>knowledge and wisdom of how to refine and extend their life by carefully
>examining scientifically and intuitively-instinctively the optimum ways of
>getting energy. raw breathairians may find any food objectionable(just jokin
>here but who knows the future evolution of our species and how it relates to
>foods we eat?)

Huh?!? Here's one scenerio for the future evolution of our species: Raw
vegan advocates convince the world that they must become strict converts
for health, and of course, spiritual reasons. Immediately libido is
diminished to absurdly low levels. The next generation, not just limited in
number but also showing a marked inability to grow to sexual maturity,
reproduces at a miserable rate. And so on, the species is extinct in
several generations.

Seriously, forest, for fun, try entertaining, just for a moment, the idea
that spirituality has no place in the human future, that our "destiny" is
to outgrow our pathetic need to codify bliss. It is of no interest to me
how true or false that may turn out to be--it is simply a way for you,
perhaps, to see how prejudiced you are _for_ all the spiritual hocus pocus.
What if the eggs in your basket (your group process thing, raw veg, and
general new agey spirity stuff) are not the "true direction" but another
fad? Again, whether or not they are the future makes no difference to me.
My point is: who decided that what _you_ believe is best for the rest?

Cheers,
Kirt

Secola  /\  Nieft
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2