PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wally Day <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:05:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I'd like to see some better guidelines. My most recent
post included the following: Info about a book called
companion planting, a comment about the
"carnivorousness" of chimps, a comment about
"indirectly" eating blueberries, and a statement about
the questionable health value of juicing. All of these
were responses to previous posts.

Now, depending upon which side of the bed you got up
on this morning, all of these items could be
considered either on-topic or off-topic. Right now, in
light of the narrow definition presented, they seem to
be bordering on "off-topic".

I'll be the first to admit that I've made a couple of
off-topic posts. I will refrain from doing so in the
future. BUT, I'd still like to see a better definition.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2