Occam's razor is only a very limited tool which is
supposed to be used to sort ideas and explanations
during the formulation of theory or hypothesis, or
when not enough data is available to even support a
hypothesis. It is NOT a "proof" nor was it intended to
be.

That said, how does Occam's razor explain those folks
who seem to do very well on a limited meat or meat
free diet, and those who do poorly on a meat rich
diet? Obviously there must be more to the story than
"Natural is better" and "Natural = techo-free"
therefore "Paleo is the answer".
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com