Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 26 May 1999 10:22:35 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It's amazing to me that someone could take a 3 sentence statement and ignore
the first two sentences. It's not like I wrote several pages or anything.
The first two sentences I wrote were:
"I find that each alternative medicine recommendation is entirely separate from
all others. Each one is based on a different principle, some are accurate,
some are partially correct, some are false."
I don't know how you can get "Alternative is bad" from that.
I also said " MOST people who use alternative medicine " which specifically
excludes anyone who doesn't happen to fit the characterization I was making.
That characterization is, btw, based on a wealth of input, including from
holistic physicians.
PS The Paleolithic Diet is certainly not "alternative medicine". First off,
Ray Audette is not a medical practitioner. Secondly, since the Paleolithic
Diet was the standard diet over 99.99% of the existence of the human race, it
is not "alternative"...
--
Cheers,
Ken <*>
> [log in to unmask]
Seems like we both suffer from misunderstood/mis-read posts.
I never said the Paleolithic diet was 'alternative medicine'. I just said it
was alternative. And it is alternative in this day and age. It might have
been the standard diet once but not any more.
Regards
Stephanie
|
|
|