PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:59:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 27 Jul 99, at 23:10, Max Timchenko wrote:

> The block size is always a factor since it is a great waste of memory
> and disk space to use 1-sector clusters for very large drives;

  On PC drives, one sector is always 512 bytes (0.5K).  I'm not dertain that
any PC hard drive format allows for clusters that are only a single sector.
  Perhaps you meant that there will always be some waste with any format
where clusters are more than one sector?
  [On average, the watsed space per file will be half of a cluster, so many
files (even/especially small ones) with a large cluster size makes for a
*lot* of waste.]
  Even though FAT32 clusters are larger than one sector, they don't need to
get any bigger over the current range of typical partition sizes.  SO the
important thing is that several small FAT32 partitions will waste just as
much space as one big one.


David G

                  Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
               articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2